March 03, 2021
Since 2019, Apple is favoring the zsh shell over Bash. The reason has not been made public, but logic dictates it is because of the licensing differences between Bash and zsh. Bash is GPL-licensed; zsh is released under the MIT-license which is less restrictive apparently. A writeup can be found here. I have been using Bash since forever and it is the default shell for all the Linux servers I manage at work. For me, it makes sense to keep using Bash on my laptops as well.
Setting the default shell to Bash
It’s not difficult to switch back to Bash when Apple -yet again- has changed the shell to zsh after a macOS update. Just open a Terminal window and type:
Verify the shell
To verify the shell has indeed changed to Bash, open a new Terminal window and type:
Depending on the shell you use, the shell prompt might also look different. Bash uses a dollar sign instead of the precentage sign used by zsh for example.
In case you’re curious what shells are available to you, it’s easy to list them. In a Terminal window, type:
This will produce output like:
# List of acceptable shells for chpass(1).
# Ftpd will not allow users to connect who are not using
# one of these shells.
Zsh does have advantages over Bash, some of which can be read here.
February 11, 2021
Another note-to-self, mostly. When working with Git and Python virtual environments, it’s nice to have a shell prompt that’s informative. I have been using various prompts in the past, some of which were great to use. After I reinstalled my MacBook I ended up not knowing what I’d been using up till then. Searching for this prompt led me to the discovery of this great prompt. I’ve been using it since I discovered it, and I still like it today :)
The prompt is very informative about Git repositories (if you happen to be in one) and virtual environments, if one is active.
January 03, 2018
A little while ago I wrote about improvements in the SSL configuration of my webserver. You can read about that here.
I decided to check my SSL configuration with Qualys’ SSL Server Test again to see if there was room for improvement. Sure enough, there was.
The report was still A+. However, I noticed two items that could possibly improved upon:
- No DNS CAA - I’ll address that in this post
- Weak 3DES ciphers - I’ll write another post about this
I had not yet implemented Certification Authority Authorization (or CAA), since I didn’t know what it was. The link in the SSL Labs report provides more information. In short, the PKI ecosystem is provided with a new control mechanism to restrict which CA’s may issue certificates for a specific domain. All you need to do is list the CA’s that you use for a specific domain in new CAA DNS record for that domain.
As of September 8, 2017, upon issuance of a new certificate for a domain, the CA is supposed to check the CAA records for that domain. If there is no matching CAA policy for the CA, the issuance should be denied (and it MAY be reported if the domain holder has iodef CAA record(s)).
From the RFC:
If the domain name holder specifies one or more iodef properties, a
certificate issuer MAY report invalid certificate requests to that
address. In the following example, the domain name holder specifies
that reports may be made by means of email with the IODEF data as an
attachment, a Web service [RFC6546], or both:
. CAA 0 issue "ca.example.net"
. CAA 0 iodef "mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org"
. CAA 0 iodef "http://iodef.example.com/"
For those of you who want to have more in-depth information, see RFC 6844.
In my case, for voipmeister.com, I am using Let’s Encrypt as the CA for my certificates. So, if I want to implement a CAA policy, all I need to do is add DNS records like this:
The second one tells any interested party that I only use Let’s Encrypt as my CA. The first record is a request to inform me at a specific email address upon violations or problems concerning certificate issuance. I created those DNS records by hand, but you may also use the SSLMate CAA Record Helper.
After we wait a while for the recent DNS change to take effect, we can recheck with the SSL Labs Tester. The result is this:
Do notice the extra green bar pertaining to CAA, and see the DNS CAA information in the details:
December 29, 2017
The other day, I was in the process of moving my blog to Pelican, a static site generator. Browsing for some themes I stumbled upon Pelican Alchemy, which led me to the site of the Nairobi GNU/Linux Users Group, where I found some nice blog posts.
One in particular caught my eye and I intend to investigate it later this weekend: Using systemd Timers to Renew Let’s Encrypt Certificates.
Looks nice, and very useful for my webserver on which I have a bunch of Let’s Encrypt certificates installed. Automating the renewal sounds appealing and it was already on my list of ‘things to look into’.
December 28, 2017
I was already looking for a Wordpress and Ghost replacement. Since I started developing in Python on my Mac, I have been visiting Justin Mayer‘s site Hacker Codex. The virtual environment examples showed me how to install Pelican and curiousity got the better of me.
Today, I managed to successfully generate my first static site (yay!). I ran into some things along the way, which I will document here later. For now, I’m pleased that everything works and that I got to know how to obtain the theme I liked (thanks Justin). By the way, that theme is called Pelicanyan.
So far, I like the geekiness of Pelican, and the lack of moving parts like databases and such. I intend to move all my blog posts to Pelican, but have to figure out how it’s done best. Most of them are Wordpress posts, the latest ones have been written in Ghost. Also geeky, but I can’t get used to working with ghost under the hood…